Professional Engineering TechnologistPr Tech Eng
The technologist category is described against broadly-defined engineering problems and activities. Evidence must match that problem category rather than the complex-problem category.
What we can and cannot say about this category
- Broadly-defined problem category.
Stages we support
Candidate
Building a record as you work, with a mentor.
Experienced applicant
Turning years of existing work into a structured account.
Registered, doing CPD
Keeping continuing development organised after registration.
Evidence template
What a candidate on this pathway typically needs to gather. This is Pr-ed's working template, not a council checklist.
- Training and experience record signed by your supervisor
- Technology application report in your own words
- Evidence of applied methods and standards
- Referee details covering the period claimed
Preparation themes
The themes your spoken accounts should eventually cover between them.
- Recognising a broadly-defined problem
- Applying established technology correctly
- Adapting methods within known limits
- Risk, safety and legal duties
- Professional and ethical conduct
Extra questions we ask on this pathway
Added after the nine core questions, tailored to this kind of work.
- Which calculations, analyses or models did you perform yourself, and how did you check them?
- Where did you have to apply engineering judgement because the codes or data did not settle it?
Mentor requirements
- Mentor registered in a comparable or higher category
Mentor coverage for this pathway is proposed and needs Pr-ed confirmation.